Return to: Diabetes News

Evidence Based Article on Diabetes



Diabetes is a key cause of many deaths in American environment. Statistics and facts developed by the National Diabetes Education Program show that around 25.8 million Americans have diabetes. More than 2.2 million Americans of 20 years and above are diagnosed with diabetes. In different research activities developed by experts, studies show that an increase in weight loss can assist in delaying and preventing diabetes patient from developing complications. The disease requires early intervention for it is considered as resulted by the increase in the level of human insulin or lack of the insulin in the body. In type 1 diabetes, there are two kinds of diabetes that are diagnosed to children and adults. The issue is associated with human body failure in performing insulin production function.
Based on the American association of diabetes, almost five percent of patients who are diabetic tend to suffer from type 1 diabetes. Insulin therapy is suitable form of treatment for this disease as well as other appropriate medical treatments. Study shows that the common form of diabetes in the society is type 2 diabetes, and it results due to the inability if human body to produce enough insulin. It also happens due to the failure of the cell to use the produced insulin in the body parts. Failure to use the insulin as per the requirement of the body leads to an increase in the body level of glucose. The aspect leads to damage in the heart, kidney, and nerves. This writing summarizes on the findings of evidence-based article on a diabetes diagnostic tool, (Nathan et al., 2008).

Diabetes Diagnostic Tool
Various evidenced based guidelines have been established for management of diabetes that helps prevent diabetes complications. These guidelines assist to improve long term outcomes for humans. It is true that the laboratory testing is essential in the diagnosis and for treatment of patients with diabetes. Evidence based research has indicated that A1C tests are the suitable laboratory tool in diagnosing diabetic patients. In the past, the tests were used in checking the average level of human glucose with diabetes for months where physicians use fasting blood glucose in the determination on the level of the glucose in the body. The procedure is not suitable because it results in wrong results especially when the patient does not eat or at times when sick, (Kahn & Fonseca, 2008).
In a study developed by Fonseca and Kahn on translating the concept of A1C, results revealed that the assay is a better tool in the determination on whether patients achieve the goal of therapy for diabetes. In the research, it has been indicated that when professionals are using A1C tool test, it offers a clear understanding on the patient level of blood glucose. It is based on the system percentage with no errors that may happen if fasting patient glucose test was applied. Based on the article, A1C assay seems to be of great benefit for patients are not supposed to fast for eight hours before they take their test. In the work by Fonseca and Kahn, it is clear that the A1C level reflect the mean daily blood glucose level plus it offers a better index for controlling the diabetic patients, (Whittemore et al., 2009).
There is various research work that affirms that there exist a strong relationship between A1C and glycemic control and based on the measurement, it have the required clinical utility. Irrespective of the benefits developed by A1C tests, some of the physicians find it difficult because they get confused since the tests use the average system and the concept may be difficult to capture. In this article, A1C offered average glucose study that is aimed at identifying if A1C findings can be expressed in the same units that are applied in monitoring the level of daily glucose in the patient’s body. Data from ADAG indicates that at any mean glucose or level of A1C, there are some scatters, thus showing less than the perfection correlation situation, (Nathan et al., 2008).
According to the research, clinicians have developed a new opportunity of re-education about the relevance of glycemic control plus the seriousness of diabetes. Clinicians and physicians who ask for an A1C test are required to get a lab report that have the familiar A1C value and from the IFCC unit. The report is suitable because it helps clinicians to make relations on A1C measures with the daily measurements of glucometer. Based on the average glucose standard measure, the situation allows assisting the clinician plus the patient to have a better and clear understanding based on the reports of A1C glucose level, (Kahn & Fonseca, 2008). The diagnostic tool is suitable as it helps in identifying a greater number of diabetic patients plus the treatment and prevention measures can be created during the right time in order to avoid complication. Using the tool, it helps reduce the number of diabetic cases in the society, and the method of treatment will be efficient.

?
Reference:
Kahn, R., & Fonseca, V. (2008). Translating the A1C Assay. Diabetes Care. pp. 1704-1707. Doi: 10.2337/dc08-0878
Nathan, D. M et al. (2008). Translating the A1C Assay Glucose Values. Diabetes Care, 31(8), 1473-1478. Doi: 10.2337/dc08-0545
Whittemore, R., Melkus, G., Wagner, J., Dziura, J., Northrup, V., & Grey, M. (2009). Diabetes Prevention Program to Primary Care. Nursing Research, 58(1), 2-12

Winnie Melda is the Managing Director of MeldaResearch.Com a globally competitive cheap essay writing service which is the premiere provider of Essay Writing Services, Research Paper Writing Services at Term Paper Writing Services at very affordable cost. For 9 years, she has helped a number of students in different academic subje ...

News Release: Evidence Based Article on Diabetes
Submitted on: December 14, 2017 09:48:41 AM
Submitted by: Winnie Melda
On behalf of: MeldaResearch.Com
advertisement